In a highly publicized case from Connecticut, Kimberly Sullivan, the stepmother accused of holding her stepson captive for over two decades, failed to appear in court today as her defense team sought to ease the conditions of her bond. Sullivan, who is currently out on a $300,000 bond, faces serious charges including first-degree assault, second-degree kidnapping, and first-degree unlawful restraint. The nature of the allegations has drawn significant attention, with law enforcement officials describing the situation as unprecedented in their experience.

Sullivan’s legal team is advocating for the return of her cell phone, the removal of her GPS monitoring device, and the possibility of her returning to the home where the alleged abuse occurred. Her absence in court today raised questions about her willingness to engage with the legal process, particularly given the gravity of the accusations against her.

The case against Sullivan was brought to light following an emergency response to a fire at her home in February, during which authorities discovered her stepson, who prefers to be identified only as “S.” At the time of his rescue, S weighed less than 70 pounds and had reportedly been held captive since he was 11 years old. He recently issued a statement through the organization Survivors Say, detailing his experience of confinement and abuse, which he claims began with his removal from public school at a young age.

S’s public statement revealed the harrowing conditions he endured, including being locked in a room for extended periods and receiving minimal food and water. He described drinking from a toilet to survive and recounted how he managed to keep track of time by listening to NASCAR races and college basketball games on a radio.

Sullivan’s arrest came in March, and since then, her defense has argued for more lenient bond conditions, citing safety concerns due to threats made against her. Her attorney expressed that the media’s portrayal of Sullivan has already led to a “rush to judgment,” complicating the pursuit of a fair trial. The defense contends that Sullivan is innocent and that the public narrative surrounding her case lacks credibility.

The state of Connecticut has called for tighter restrictions on Sullivan, arguing that new evidence and witness testimony strengthen their case. Although a judge opted against house arrest, Sullivan remains under GPS monitoring. Today’s hearing was largely procedural, with the defense indicating they are still awaiting discovery materials from the prosecution.

Outside of the courtroom, S’s biological mother has spoken out, sharing her concerns about Sullivan’s husband, S’s biological father, who passed away earlier this year. While it remains unclear what role he may have played in the alleged abuse, S’s mother expressed regret for not being able to protect her son and revealed that she had attempted to find him in the past.

As the legal proceedings continue, Sullivan’s next court date is scheduled for May 27. With the case attracting widespread media attention, it remains to be seen how the court will navigate the complexities of public perception and the serious nature of the allegations against her. S’s testimony, along with the evidence collected by law enforcement, will likely play a critical role in the outcome of this case.